Published on Tuesday, November 3, 2009 - 11:24am
Zemeckis Confirms That Performance Capture Factors Into The New ROGER RABBIT Film!! But, How??
Yesterday we learned that the writers of the original ROGER RABBIT film are returning to script a proposed sequel (details HERE ).
That news came from a video snippet over at MTV, in which Robert Zemeckis briefly touched on the project. A longer sampling of the same interview has now been posted, in which Bob reveals that performance capture (a la BEOWULF, A CHRISTMAS CAROL, and the forthcoming YELOW SUBMARINE) would play some part in the new ROGER RABBIT film. The question is: considering the "universe" in which ROGER is set, how will the technology fit in, exactly?
I wouldn't use it for the cartoon characters, because I think they should stay two dimensional...I wouldn't dimensionalize Roger.
[EDIT]
All the other characters they would have fun with would be magnificent in performance capture technology. It would be really fun.
...says Zemeckis in THIS VIDEO INTERVIEW over at MTV:
So, what the hell does this mean? Will humans who get thrown into Toon Town now be realized via performance capture? Will the sequel be entirely performance capture - featuring Toon pests who MoCap characters discriminate against because they're not rendered as well, or rendered differently? Will any live action/"real world" components feature into this project at all? Or, as MTV speculates, might performance capture actually be part of the storyline? I.e. might we have performance capture characters interacting with live action characters...alongside Roger and his Toon squad...as the new/upstart Toons in town?
Really intrigued...
Reader Talkback
Freeway=toon town by MeadoweNov 3rd, 2009 11:26:49 AM Good God no by white_vaderNov 3rd, 2009 11:27:04 AM zemeckis is like lucas and
cameron by MeadoweNov 3rd, 2009 11:28:13 AM this is gettin complicated by knowthyselfNov 3rd, 2009 11:29:11 AM How are you lumping Cameron
with Lucas? by knowthyselfNov 3rd, 2009 11:30:10 AM How are you lumping Cameron
with Lucas? by knowthyselfNov 3rd, 2009 11:33:07 AM ZEMECKIS REPENTS FOR
EVERYTHING HE"S DONE SINCE
BTHF by 3 Bag EnemaNov 3rd, 2009 11:35:43 AM Er, BTTF. by 3 Bag EnemaNov 3rd, 2009 11:37:28 AM He will have a young CGI Bob
Hoskins there! by ricarleite2Nov 3rd, 2009 11:39:39 AM At what point in "history" is
this being based? by The Dum GuyNov 3rd, 2009 11:41:40 AM Don't the majority of people
HATE performance capture? by santoandersonNov 3rd, 2009 11:44:43 AM Ew... by Jack_MortNov 3rd, 2009 11:45:16 AM I really hope "A Christmas
Carol" flops by BenBraddockNov 3rd, 2009 11:45:30 AM how can I lump them? by MeadoweNov 3rd, 2009 11:51:28 AM So no 3D Jessica Rabbit? by ominusNov 3rd, 2009 11:53:16 AM I think old Bob means when
actors interact with toons by terry1978Nov 3rd, 2009 11:54:03 AM What is Derivative About Star
Wars? by DarfurOnTheRocks2Nov 3rd, 2009 11:55:00 AM Zemeckis has gone insane! by TheMcflyFarmNov 3rd, 2009 11:57:58 AM Oh come on, wouldn't you
people LOVE a BTTF4? by ricarleite2Nov 3rd, 2009 12:04:10 PM I got a bad feeling about this by BrigonNov 3rd, 2009 12:05:02 PM Ender's Game by enderandrewNov 3rd, 2009 12:08:37 PM They should lock Zemeckis up by IAmLegolasNov 3rd, 2009 12:09:18 PM Uncanney Valley by enderandrewNov 3rd, 2009 12:10:25 PM maybe they want to put Pixar
in it by DatascreamNov 3rd, 2009 12:11:58 PM Well maybe it's for historical
characters/actors who are
dead? by JohnnoNov 3rd, 2009 12:13:25 PM There is SERIOUS potential
here... by ToulonNov 3rd, 2009 12:13:34 PM Why hate on Zemeckis? by enderandrewNov 3rd, 2009 12:14:30 PM Enderandrew by ToulonNov 3rd, 2009 12:19:22 PM But can they again strike that
golden deal between disney and
WB by Geomancer21Nov 3rd, 2009 12:23:06 PM Don't forget CONTACT by ledbowmanNov 3rd, 2009 12:26:05 PM Geomancer by ledbowmanNov 3rd, 2009 12:27:49 PM Zemeckis is dead to me now by kwisatzhaderachNov 3rd, 2009 12:29:51 PM Live action elements or FUCK
IT. by performingmonkeyNov 3rd, 2009 12:34:21 PM Zemeckis says he wants to
perfect the technology by terry1978Nov 3rd, 2009 12:36:03 PM wasn't Kathleen Turner Jessica
Rabbit by MeadoweNov 3rd, 2009 12:37:31 PM Aging, unemployed Roger Rabbit
visits a CGI rejuvenation
clinic. by Darth_InedibleNov 3rd, 2009 12:44:09 PM If Chinatown was the template
for the first by skimnNov 3rd, 2009 12:44:29 PM Waaaaaah! I hate mo-cap!
Waaaaah! I hate Zemeckis! by slone13Nov 3rd, 2009 12:52:19 PM It'll never happen, but... by ToulonNov 3rd, 2009 12:55:05 PM Way to kill my interest,
Zemeckis by FeralAngelNov 3rd, 2009 01:21:27 PM Bob Hoskins is in, or I'm out. by HarryCalderNov 3rd, 2009 01:32:45 PM Beowulf was amazing by TheLastBoyScoutNov 3rd, 2009 01:36:28 PM A V A T A R - Fucking your
eyeballs in December!!! by Motoko KusanagiNov 3rd, 2009 01:53:11 PM Oh god, this is going to suck,
isn't it? by scrivenerNov 3rd, 2009 02:09:41 PM sigh by brakemonkeyNov 3rd, 2009 02:28:27 PM I don't hate the idea of . . . by Royston LodgeNov 3rd, 2009 02:39:33 PM At Least We'll Always Have
Paris Zemeckis by FreeBeerNov 3rd, 2009 02:39:50 PM Geomancer21: WB & Disney
characters... by Royston LodgeNov 3rd, 2009 02:43:24 PM Zemeckis' Beowulf doesn't hold
a candle to ... by Royston LodgeNov 3rd, 2009 02:47:23 PM I like the idea of using
today's Animated characters... by ThePorkChopExpressNov 3rd, 2009 02:54:20 PM Bob Hoskins will be replaced
with Ray Winstone!!!!! by XxplosiveNov 3rd, 2009 02:56:03 PM Hrrm, Could be clever... by FreeBeerNov 3rd, 2009 02:58:19 PM FUCK...YOU...GOOOOOOOODDDDDDDD
DD by Nasty In The PastyNov 3rd, 2009 03:05:13 PM Bob Z fell into the uncanny
valley and can't get up. by UtamohNov 3rd, 2009 03:06:43 PM roger was always so
unappealing though... by Ivor HeathNov 3rd, 2009 03:10:21 PM "It would be really fun." by Subtitles_OffNov 3rd, 2009 03:13:14 PM Ivor Heath: How dare you? by HarryCalderNov 3rd, 2009 03:20:49 PM by leeroychileNov 3rd, 2009 03:32:18 PM I really don't see a movie
about 2D toons vs. 3D cgi. by Royston LodgeNov 3rd, 2009 03:35:55 PM by leeroychileNov 3rd, 2009 03:43:07 PM In that case, the toons should
team-up with ... by Royston LodgeNov 3rd, 2009 03:48:44 PM by leeroychileNov 3rd, 2009 03:53:11 PM Royston Lodge by TheNorthlanderNov 3rd, 2009 04:15:37 PM Royston Lodge by TheNorthlanderNov 3rd, 2009 04:17:41 PM Better yet..fuck the CGI by skimnNov 3rd, 2009 04:21:11 PM Oh my, I didn't think of the
Muppets! by Royston LodgeNov 3rd, 2009 04:36:53 PM What part of Jessica will be
performance captured? by marineboyNov 3rd, 2009 04:59:47 PM Ricarleite by MandrakeRootNov 3rd, 2009 05:02:35 PM Its racist that anime isn't
included in this by MacReady452Nov 3rd, 2009 05:06:38 PM But...WHY? by Stegman84Nov 3rd, 2009 05:12:18 PM Re: Stegman84 by ricarleite2Nov 3rd, 2009 06:10:50 PM It should take place in the
present and be 2D by Dr.DirtyDNov 3rd, 2009 06:33:41 PM Just make it 3D and call it a
day. by lockesbrokenlegNov 3rd, 2009 06:36:44 PM Classic animation, some mo-cap
cartoons, and live action by Tall_Boy66Nov 3rd, 2009 06:56:17 PM More possible plot-lines that
rape your childhood but make
me ch by Royston LodgeNov 3rd, 2009 07:14:19 PM "but make me chuckle" by Royston LodgeNov 3rd, 2009 07:14:49 PM terry1978 makes an interesting
point about Mo-Cap by Royston LodgeNov 3rd, 2009 07:27:56 PM Wait. by TedKordLivesNov 3rd, 2009 07:50:30 PM intrigued? by Buzz_AldrinNov 3rd, 2009 07:55:38 PM Love it! Zemeckis is one of my
favorite directors by IndyCollectorNov 3rd, 2009 08:20:45 PM by leeroychileNov 3rd, 2009 08:28:33 PM We know what mocap is... by Stegman84Nov 3rd, 2009 08:51:08 PM FUCK NO!!!!! by fassbinder79Nov 3rd, 2009 09:01:15 PM Rob, you're pretty cool and
all, but please by lockesbrokenlegNov 3rd, 2009 09:24:03 PM My childhood has been raped so
many times... by Uncle ClayNov 3rd, 2009 09:32:43 PM How MoCap figures in,,, by BattybrainNov 3rd, 2009 10:08:22 PM DUCK POTATOES!!! by MainMan2001Nov 3rd, 2009 10:13:55 PM I hear Robert Zemeckis is an
asshole by D.VaderNov 3rd, 2009 10:16:48 PM D.Vader...your a guy involved
in the Business.. by conspiracyNov 4th, 2009 12:34:34 AM Stegman84 by MandrakeRootNov 4th, 2009 01:41:55 AM *accepting it as a cartoon by MandrakeRootNov 4th, 2009 01:42:35 AM I remember I wrote to Zemeckis
back in the by lockesbrokenlegNov 4th, 2009 02:54:44 AM Spielberg reportedly is,
Conspiracy? by D.VaderNov 4th, 2009 04:22:49 AM This is the first time I have
had a problem with Zemeckis by NomoredirtyjokespleaseweareYan
ksNov 4th, 2009 04:45:11 AM WHYYYYYY??? by JT KirkNov 4th, 2009 04:54:46 AM Classic characters=2D, Pixar =
CGI, Humans= Live action. by GibsonUSA ReturnsNov 4th, 2009 04:59:46 AM I don't think that they should
be dimensionalizing BIG LOB. by GibsonUSA ReturnsNov 4th, 2009 05:02:50 AM I Predict Robert Zemeckis Next
Film Will Be... by TheNorthlanderNov 4th, 2009 07:02:20 AM AICN, stop defending this hack by reflectoNov 4th, 2009 08:03:39 AM Zemeckis, serously FUCK OFF
with MO-CAP by chronicallydepressedlemmingNov 4th, 2009 08:09:23 AM jessica Biel for Jessica
Rabbit............ by mojoman69Nov 4th, 2009 08:37:22 AM I have hope in this... by The_Crimson_KingNov 4th, 2009 09:05:17 AM Dead-Eyed MoCap Characters
OBVIOUS ZOMBIES by ThusSpakeSpymunkNov 4th, 2009 09:14:03 AM if they remake Moonwalker by Bouncy XNov 4th, 2009 10:35:04 AM Fucking Robert Zemeckis by AsimovLivesNov 4th, 2009 11:16:34 AM Betty Boop! by HagakureNov 4th, 2009 12:42:51 PM enderandrew... Enders game by MurderMostFowlNov 4th, 2009 08:35:24 PM